Table 1A: Mean results of haematological examination in the Control group before and after receiving regimen I without Liv.52 |
Timings |
Hb g% |
TLC cells/mm |
DLC |
ESR mm fall 1st hr. |
P |
L |
E |
On admission |
11.0 ± 2.14 |
9800 |
79 |
20 |
1 |
48 |
After 1st month |
11.0 ± 2.00 |
9200 |
78 |
21 |
1 |
35 |
2nd month |
11.2 ± 1.96 |
10000 |
82 |
17 |
– |
32 |
3rd month |
11.2 ± 2.96 |
11000 |
80 |
20 |
– |
30 |
4th month |
11.4 ± 2.30 |
11500 |
75 |
25 |
– |
27 |
6th month |
11.5 ± 1.93 |
12000 |
76 |
24 |
– |
25 |
Table 1B: Mean results of haematological examination in the Test group before and after receiving regimen II with Liv.52 |
Timings |
Hb g% |
TLC cells/mm |
DLC |
ESR mm fall 1st hr. |
P |
L |
E |
On admission |
11.5 ± 1.82 |
8500 |
80 |
19 |
1 |
40 |
After 1st month |
11.7 ± 1.63 |
8300 |
75 |
25 |
– |
35 |
2nd month |
12.0 ± 2.06 |
8350 |
70 |
30 |
– |
32 |
3rd month |
12.3 ± 2.00 |
8400 |
65 |
35 |
– |
27 |
4th month |
12.5 ± 1.84 |
8300 |
70 |
30 |
– |
27 |
6th month |
12.8 ±1.68 |
8300 |
72 |
38 |
– |
16 |
Table IIA: Mean results of urine analysis in the Control group before and after receiving regimen I without Liv.52 |
Timings |
Albumin |
Bile salts |
Bile pigments |
Urobilinogen |
On admission |
Traces |
++ |
++ |
1/30 |
After 1st month |
Traces |
+= |
++ |
1/30 |
2nd month |
Traces |
+ |
++ |
1/20 |
3rd month |
Nil |
+ |
+ |
1/20 |
4th month |
Nil |
Nil |
+ |
1/10 |
6th month |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
1/10 |
Table IIB: Mean results of urine analysis in the Test group before and after receiving regimen II with Liv.52 |
Timings |
Albumin |
Bile salts |
Bile pigments |
Urobilinogen |
On admission |
++ |
++ |
++ |
1/40 |
After 1st month |
Traces |
+ |
+ |
1/20 |
2nd month |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
1/10 |
3rd month |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
4th month |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
6th month |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Liver Function Tests: On surveying the mean results of liver function tests, a marked improvement was observed in the Test group on Liv.52 as compared to the Control group. There was a rapid fall in the serum bilirubin level and a rise in the levels of total serum proteins and serum albumin. Besides this, there was an early fall in the levels of serum globulin, zinc sulphate turbidity and serum alkaline phosphatase after Liv.52 therapy (Table III B). This clearly indicates that patients of the Test group showed a good response to Liv.52 therapy.
Table IIIA: Mean results of liver function tests in the Control group before and after regimen I without Liv.52 |
Timings |
Serum bilirubin mg% |
Total serum protein g% |
Albumin g% |
Globulin g% |
Van den Bergh reaction |
T.T. units |
T.F. units |
Z.S.T. Units |
Serum alkaline phosphatase K.A. Units |
On admission |
7.1 ± 2.06 |
6.8 ± 0.58 |
3.0 ± 0.53 |
3.8 ± 0.62 |
DI+ |
10 |
+2 |
16 |
46 ± 12 |
After 1st month |
5.2 ±1.98 |
6.8 ± 0.93 |
3.2 ± 0.73 |
3.6 ± 0.59 |
DI+ |
6 |
+2 |
16 |
40 ± 16 |
2nd month |
3.8 ± 1.62 |
6.9 ± 1.62 |
3.2 ±0.37 |
3.7 ± 0.69 |
DI+ |
6 |
+1 |
12 |
35 ± 10 |
3rd month |
2.7 ± 1.90 |
6.9 ±1.03 |
3.3 ± 0.46 |
3.6 ± 0.38 |
DI+ |
4 |
+1 |
10 |
31 ± 13 |
4th month |
1.8 ± 1.34 |
7.0 ± 0.86 |
3.4 ± 0.72 |
3.6 ± 0.63 |
DD+ |
3 |
Neg. |
10 |
27 ± 9 |
6th month |
1.6 ± 1.00 |
7.1 ± 0.63 |
3.5 ± 0.45 |
3.6 ± 0.81 |
Neg. |
3 |
Neg. |
8 |
18 ± 9 |
Refference:
http://www.himalayahealthcare.com/pdf_files/liv236.pdf
Copyrights © 2009 healthyliver.co.uk