A Preliminary Report on the Role of Liv.52 – An Indigenous Drug in Serum B Hepatitis Cases


Patney, N.L., M.D., M.A.M.S. (Med.), M.R.C.P. (Lond.), M.R.C.P. (Glas.), D.T.M.& H. (Edin.), D.T.C.D. (Wales) and Ashok Kumar, M.Sc. Postgraduate Department of Medicine, S.N. Medical College, Agra, India.

Table 1A: Mean results of haematological examination in the Control group before and after receiving regimen I without Liv.52
Timings Hb g% TLC cells/mm DLC ESR mm fall 1st hr.
P L E
On admission 11.0 ± 2.14 9800 79 20 1 48
After 1st month 11.0 ± 2.00 9200 78 21 1 35
2nd month 11.2 ± 1.96 10000 82 17 32
3rd month 11.2 ± 2.96 11000 80 20 30
4th month 11.4 ± 2.30 11500 75 25 27
6th month 11.5 ± 1.93 12000 76 24 25

Table 1B: Mean results of haematological examination in the Test group before and after receiving regimen II with Liv.52
Timings Hb g% TLC cells/mm DLC ESR mm fall 1st hr.
P L E
On admission 11.5 ± 1.82 8500 80 19 1 40
After 1st month 11.7 ± 1.63 8300 75 25 35
2nd month 12.0 ± 2.06 8350 70 30 32
3rd month 12.3 ± 2.00 8400 65 35 27
4th month 12.5 ± 1.84 8300 70 30 27
6th month 12.8 ±1.68 8300 72 38 16


Table IIA: Mean results of urine analysis in the Control group before and after receiving regimen I without Liv.52
Timings Albumin Bile salts Bile pigments Urobilinogen
On admission Traces ++ ++ 1/30
After 1st month Traces += ++ 1/30
2nd month Traces + ++ 1/20
3rd month Nil + + 1/20
4th month Nil Nil + 1/10
6th month Nil Nil Nil 1/10

Table IIB: Mean results of urine analysis in the Test group before and after receiving regimen II with Liv.52
Timings Albumin Bile salts Bile pigments Urobilinogen
On admission ++ ++ ++ 1/40
After 1st month Traces + + 1/20
2nd month Nil Nil Nil 1/10
3rd month Nil Nil Nil Nil
4th month Nil Nil Nil Nil
6th month Nil Nil Nil Nil


Liver Function Tests: On surveying the mean results of liver function tests, a marked improvement was observed in the Test group on Liv.52 as compared to the Control group. There was a rapid fall in the serum bilirubin level and a rise in the levels of total serum proteins and serum albumin. Besides this, there was an early fall in the levels of serum globulin, zinc sulphate turbidity and serum alkaline phosphatase after Liv.52 therapy (Table III B). This clearly indicates that patients of the Test group showed a good response to Liv.52 therapy.

Table IIIA: Mean results of liver function tests in the Control group before and after regimen I without Liv.52
Timings Serum bilirubin mg% Total serum protein g% Albumin g% Globulin g% Van den Bergh reaction T.T. units T.F. units Z.S.T. Units Serum alkaline phosphatase K.A. Units
On admission 7.1 ± 2.06 6.8 ± 0.58 3.0 ± 0.53 3.8 ± 0.62 DI+ 10 +2 16 46 ± 12
After 1st month 5.2 ±1.98 6.8 ± 0.93 3.2 ± 0.73 3.6 ± 0.59 DI+ 6 +2 16 40 ± 16
2nd month 3.8 ± 1.62 6.9 ± 1.62 3.2 ±0.37 3.7 ± 0.69 DI+ 6 +1 12 35 ± 10
3rd month 2.7 ± 1.90 6.9 ±1.03 3.3 ± 0.46 3.6 ± 0.38 DI+ 4 +1 10 31 ± 13
4th month 1.8 ± 1.34 7.0 ± 0.86 3.4 ± 0.72 3.6 ± 0.63 DD+ 3 Neg. 10 27 ± 9
6th month 1.6 ± 1.00 7.1 ± 0.63 3.5 ± 0.45 3.6 ± 0.81 Neg. 3 Neg. 8 18 ± 9


Refference: http://www.himalayahealthcare.com/pdf_files/liv236.pdf
free delivery Liv 52
Copyrights © 2009 healthyliver.co.uk